venerdì 10 ottobre 2008

BAR STOOL ECONOMICS

Apparently a professor of economics dreamed up this little story, which we like lots.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to US$100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. 
The fifth would pay US$1. 
The sixth would pay US$3. 
The seventh would pay US$7. 
The eighth would pay US$12.
The ninth would pay US$18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay US$59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by US$20. Drinks for the ten now cost just US$80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the US$20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?They realized that US$20 divided by six is US$3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay!

And so: 

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings). 
The sixth now paid US$2 instead of US$3 (33%savings). 
The seventh now pay US$5 instead of US$7 (28%savings). 
The eighth now paid US$9 instead of US$12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid US$14 instead of US$18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid US$49 instead of US$59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
'I only got a dollar out of the US$20, 'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got US$10!' 
'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!'
'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get US$10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!
'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. 
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

3 commenti:

Anonimo ha detto...

Il discorso sembrerebbe sensato e darebbe ragione a tutti quei leader politici che vincono le elezioni promettendo "Meno tasse per tutti". Il problema è che, mentre nella storiella il proprietario del bar sembrerebbe potersi permettere di applicare lo sconto ai 10 clienti, nella realtà questo raramente è possibile. Ecco che quindi, rimanendo nell'allegoria della storiella narrata dall'economista, dopo un po' di tempo, i clienti del bar si ritroveranno a bere birra di qualità minore, perché il proprietario non potrà più permettersi di offrire loro la bevanda di migliore qualità e quindi più costosa. Solo il decimo cliente, il più ricco, e che più ha beneficiato dello sconto, potrà ordinare la vecchia birra pagando un pugno di dollari in più.

Anonimo ha detto...

Bell' intervento ... bravo Leo !

Leolo ha detto...

Come saggezza impone direi che la verità sta nel mezzo!
Entrambe le controparti hanno ragione ma tutte e due mancano di moderazione.
Concordo cmq sul fatto fatto che la storiella sia fortemente capitalistica!